 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Banks, No. SC87921,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's first-degree murder and armed criminal action convictions were reversed where the prosecutor's reference to appellant as the "Devil" in rebuttal closing argument was a personal and inflammatory attack and the trial court's failure to promptly and firmly rebuke counsel in front of the jury prejudiced appellant.
|
|||||
| State v. Berry, WD 66472,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 27, 2007, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Cannon, WD64784,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 27, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err and violate defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights admitting witness's 911 call as statements made during call were not testimonial. Trial court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant's threats against witness as it was relevant to show consciousness of guilt in view of defendant's claimed defense.
|
|||||
| State v. Cooper, No. SC87787,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's first-degree burglary conviction under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 569.190 (2000) was reversed where the verdict-directing jury instruction omitted an essential element of the offense, i.e., that defendant knowingly entered the victim's house unlawfully, and whether defendant had entered the house unlawfully was in serious dispute at trial.
|
|||||
| State v. Hunter, No. ED88697,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ingrim, WD 65911,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 27, 2007, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. McGinness, No. ED87116,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, February 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a possession of a controlled substance case, the State's erroneous reclassification of the offense when it amended the information under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 23.08 to include that defendant was a prior drug offender did not render the information fatally defective as the classification was not an essential element and its inclusion was surplusage.
|
|||||
| State v. Pointer, WD 66311,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 27, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's Batson challenges given one juror's past employment as a prison guard and her feelings regarding prosecution of her nephew. Stated reason for striking another juror was the number of family members affected by murder; case was a murder case being prosecuted by the same staff that prosecuted his family.
|
|||||
| State v. Renfrow, WD 66102,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 27, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred when it overruled defendant's motion to suppress evidence of defendant's intoxication in defendant's trial for DWI, a violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.010. Because a police officer made the initial stop outside of the officer's jurisdiction and was not in pursuit under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 544.157, the stop was unlawful.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
