|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Missouri - March 14, 2006
|
| |
In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes by Action in Rem, WD 65122,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, March 14, 2006, Decided , March 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying a credit union's motion to set aside tax sale because the sales price was not grossly inadequate so as to shock its conscience, and due process was satisfied when the county sent notice to the last known address as shown in the recorder of deeds office where the credit union's deed of trust was recorded.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pointer v. Washington, No. ED86169,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 14, 2006, Decided , March 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The trial court denied the father's motion for a preliminary injunction stopping the mother from collecting child support payments under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.340, because she interfered with his child visitation. The order denying the injunction was interlocutory; therefore, the father could not appeal.
|
|
| |
Rende v. Rende, No. ED85982,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 14, 2006, Decided , March 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court erred in terminating ex-wife's maintenance as she clearly made efforts to attain employment through her real estate career and become self-sufficient. Also, under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.355.1, given the vast disparity between the wife's financial resources and the ex-husband's, trial court erred in denying her request for attorneys' fees.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
