 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Southern Star Cent. Gas Pipeline, Inc. v. Murray, No. 26930,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, March 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding in favor of a purchaser in an action involving an impairment of a pipeline easement was appropriate because, by the corporation's own admission, what it currently claimed as its easement had the structure at issue encroaching upon it with its knowledge for over 12 years before it filed suit.
|
|||||
| State v. Edmonds, No. 26554,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a forcible rape, forcible sodomy, and incest case, as defendant was not in custody at any time during the interview, and as he voluntarily talked with the deputy about anything but the one question regarding whether he had intercourse with his daughter, the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress.
|
|||||
| Gurtz v. Gurtz, No. 27134,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of the husband's petition was affirmed because the husband's petition failed to invoke principles of substantive law, when once the trial court had been divided as part of a final decree, a pension could not be redivided after circumstances had changed.
|
|||||
| Nixon v. Summit Inv. Co., LLC, No. 27274,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court abused its discretion by dismissing an action under the Missouri Clean Water Law, Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 644.011 to 644.141 et seq., without prejudice under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 510.140 because negotiations were ongoing, agreements had been reached, and there were outstanding discovery requests pending at the time.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
