 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hoyt v. GE Capital Mortg. Servs., No. ED86309,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 21, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in not submitting the issue of punitive damages to a jury in borrowers' action against lender for intentional interference where the lender failed to disclose its use of a suspense account, constantly refused to acknowledge the borrowers' requests for information about their account, and failed to retract damaging credit reports.
|
|||||
| In re R.B., No. SC86979,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In juvenile officer's appeal from dismissal of delinquency petition, juvenile officer claimed lower court erred in not allowing victim's videotaped testimony. Appellate court lacked jurisdiction because Mo. Rev. Stat. § 211.261 did not authorize juvenile officer to appeal final judgments in delinquency proceedings, and double jeopardy had attached.
|
|||||
| Investors Title Co. v. Hammonds, No. ED85951,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying a county's motion for JNOV when a title company failed to show evidence of a written contract, as required under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 432.070, as there was no need for a written contract for the company to have an action against the county for money had and received when a county employee pled guilty to theft.
|
|||||
| Jennings v. Chatsworth Apts. Project Ltd., WD65358 and WD65377,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, March 21, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the only consideration on a 1995 promissory note was a partnership's liability on a 1980 note, but the partnership had not signed the 1980 note and was therefore not liable on it, the 1995 note lacked consideration to make a binding agreement and partnership was thus not liable for it, and summary judgment for the partnership was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Mayo v. State, No. ED85973,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McLaughlin v. Okla. S. Transp., Inc., DOCKET NUMBER WD65430,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, March 21, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Moore v. Moore, WD64015 Consolidated with WD64055,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, March 21, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The distribution of the parties' property in a dissolution proceeding was improper in part pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.330 because the evidence showed that nonmarital and marital funds were both deposited into a checking account and that the wife made no effort to trace and identify what portion of the balance was her separate property.
|
|||||
| Ray v. HP Mgmt., Inc., DOCKET NUMBER WD65488,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, March 21, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shead v. State, No. ED85884,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
