|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Missouri - April 3, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Cushshon, No. ED87764,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction for possession of a controlled substance in a correctional facility, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 221.111, because another inmate had defendant's mattress for an undetermined time, and there was no evidence that when defendant dragged the mattress to his cell, he was aware that drugs were inside the mattress.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Gibbs, WD 66334,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 3, 2007, Decided , April 3, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain a resisting arrest conviction, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 575.150, because an officer testified that he opened the door wide enough to see defendant sufficiently to determine that he matched a suspect's description, and from that, the jury could infer that the door was opened enough for defendant to see the police uniform.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Lewis, No. ED86961,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In trial for child molestation, in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 566.067, defendant impliedly waived his right to counsel because defendant was not presumed indigent, and defendant had time to procure counsel. Also, admission of child's videotape describing uncharged violent acts was not reversible error because exhibit was merely cumulative.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
