Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Missouri - April 5 - April 10, 2006
	Rolfes v. Rolfes (In re Marriage of Rolfes), No. 27050, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 5, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Appellate court reversed a trial court's ruling that modified a portion of a dissolution decree as Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 74.06 made no provision for the amendment of a portion of the prior judgment. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Croy v. Div. of Empl. Sec., No. 27289, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 6, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Appellate court reversed a finding that a claimant had been discharged for willful misconduct under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.050.2 because the record established only one case of tardiness or absenteeism, there was no evidence that the claimant was faking her illness, and she timely reported her tardiness and absence to her supervisor. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Bremenkamp, No. 26975, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 10, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's drug convictions were appropriate under the Fifth Amendment where, when she was released from custody after her October 16, 2003, arrest, the resulting "break in custody" dissolved her protections against further police interrogation under the Miranda-Edwards rule. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.