 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Citizens for the Pres. of Buehler Park v. City of Rolla, No. 27130,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Citizens had standing to challenge sale of city park where the trial court had to decide whether the attempted alienation of the park from the city was a legal or illegal expenditure and whether the citizens had evidence to support a claim of illegal expenditures of public funds or the prospect of such illegal expenditures based upon evidence.
|
|||||
| Maloy v. Cabinet & Bath Supply, Inc., No. 27017,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying an employee workers' compensation benefits as no witnesses to the moving of the mantel on the day the employee contended he was injured remembered the mantel dropping or the employee contending he was injured, and his medical records lacked a history of the alleged injury for almost a year and a half thereafter.
|
|||||
| State v. Eoff, No. 26047,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a first degree robbery case, because there was evidence that defendant used a dangerous instrument, i.e., a billy club shaped piece of wood, to rob the victim, the trial court did not err in refusing to give a lesser-included offense instruction, under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 556.046.2, on robbery in the second degree.
|
|||||
| Richards v. Richards (In re Richards), No. 26668,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Joint physical custody of the children, with sole legal custody to the father, was affirmed because the mother did not dispute the trial court's finding that she was not likely to allow the children to have frequent, continuing or meaningful contact with the father.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
