 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beach v. Dir. of Revenue, WD 65314,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The setting aside of the revocation of a driver's driving license was improper pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.041 because a qualified consent was deemed to have been a refusal for purposes of § 577.041. By attaching conditions to his consent, the driver in essence refused to take the breath test.
|
|||||
| Harrison v. State, WD 65680,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hertz Corp. v. RAKS Hospitality, Inc., No. ED85454,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment in favor of buyer on its claim of unjust enrichment against a seller after the buyer paid real property taxes that the seller should have paid was affirmed; buyer did not need to exhaust administrative remedies, trial court did not lack subject matter jurisdiction to address the claim, and it had not erred in submitting jury instructions.
|
|||||
| Hickerson v. McCarthy Spice & Blends, No. ED86852,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hoecker v. Hoecker, WD64953,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in refusing to grant husband continuance where trial had already been rescheduled and husband was practicing attorney. Couple's condo was marital property and value of marital home was properly determined. Pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.330, there was insufficient evidence for court to make just division of marital assets.
|
|||||
| In re Lawton, No. ED86650,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In the Interest of I.M.B., No. ED86777,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jones v. Dir. of Revenue, WD 65600,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Director of revenue failed to meet burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that a passenger was driving a truck pursuant to circumstances set out in Mo. Rev. Stat. § 302.505 where another person was driving vehicle when sheriff pulled truck over and circumstantial evidence did not establish that passenger had driven the truck.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. ED86823,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
