LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Missouri - April 11 - April 13, 2007

  
Beach v. State, No. 27918, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion for rehearing and motion to transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court was denied where the Missouri Supreme Court did not broaden and enlarge the kind of prejudice that would support a claim of ineffective assistance of plea counsel.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Merrick, No. 27671, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court had jurisdiction over defendant's case where defendant failed to show that he substantially complied with Missouri Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Law by addressing his request for disposition to the prosecuting attorney or that the prosecuting attorney received the written request, as required by Mo. Rev. Stat. § 217.450.1.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In the Interest of K.K., No. 27857, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, April 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly terminated mother's parental rights under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 211.447.4(3) because children had been under court's jurisdiction for at least one year when termination petition was filed, conditions which led to assumption of jurisdiction persisted, and there was little likelihood that conditions would be remedied at early date.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.