 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Richardson v. Richardson, No. ED86807,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a motion to terminate spousal maintenance obligation, trial court erred in dismissing matter because husband's strongest arguments were founded in public policy: husband alleged that former wife engaged in murder-for-hire scheme. To extent trial court believed pleading abuse had taken place, trial court could look to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.355.
|
|||||
| State v. Gibbs, No. ED85525,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lewis, WD 64378,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge erred by sua sponte finding defendant not guilty of assault and armed criminal action by reason of mental disease or defect, under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 552.030, and ordering him to be committed to the Department of Mental Health where defendant did not enter a plea of not guilty by reason of a mental disease or defect.
|
|||||
| State v. Scott, ED85772,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's conviction of attempted tampering with physical evidence because the premise of defendant's argument for why his motions for judgment of acquittal should have been granted failed; the search of his vehicle that he was challenging was valid as a search incident to a lawful arrest for driving while suspended.
|
|||||
| State v. Spellman, No. ED85950,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Tedder v. Tedder, No. ED86394,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vinson v. Vinson, Nos. ED86116 & ED86147,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vinson v. Vinson, Nos. ED86117 & ED86125,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Waldrop v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., WD65518,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred as a matter of law when it granted summary judgment to an insurer because, under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 379.203.4 (2000) and Schaeffer, the insurer's proposed settlement agreement that required injured passenger to subrogate any uninsured motorist claims he might also receive from his own insurer, was beyond the scope allowable by law.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
