|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Missouri - April 24, 2007
|
| |
APAC Kan., Inc. v. Smith, WD 67464,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 24, 2007, Decided, April 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission did not err under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.220.1 in finding that an employee's last injury alone rendered her totally disabled where no evidence showed that her headaches, which occurred several times a week and caused her to need to lie down between 10 and 40 minutes, predated last workplace incident.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Brown v. SSA Sec., Inc., No. ED89425,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed a decision denying claimant unemployment benefits, claimant failed to file her notice of appeal within the time permitted by Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 288.200.2, 288.210. The appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Collier v. City of Oak Grove, WD65355,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, April 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: When city's sewage system continually backed up into a homeowner's basement, leaving behind a black, slimy substance that smelled of feces, trial court did not err in submitting issue of inverse condemnation to a jury, and city was subject to having award rendered against it for prejudgment interest, pursuant to Mo. Const. art. I, § 26.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|