|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Missouri - May 5, 2006
|
| |
Bantle v. Dwyer, Case No. 27465,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: State improperly calculated appellant's mandatory minimum prison term under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 558.019 (2000) because Mo. Rev. Stat. § 217.362.5 (Cum. Supp. 2004), which applied retroactively, prohibited considering appellant's placement in a long-term drug treatment program as a prior commitment; thus, he only had two prior commitments, not three.
|
|
| |
|
| |
McCutchen v. Peoplease Corp., No. 27075,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Claimant's injuries, sustained in a fight at work with his son, who was his subordinate at work, were compensable under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.120.1 (2000) where, although the evidence was conflicting, the claimant and his son both testified that the son and not the claimant escalated the dispute from verbal to physical.
|
|
| |
RPCS, Inc. v. Waters, Nos. 27309 and 27311 Consolidated,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Former employer failed to prove that claimant willfully or deliberately violated its employee policies simply because shortages existed in claimant's till. Thus, under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.050.1(1) and .2, there was no misconduct, and Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission properly awarded claimant unemployment compensation benefits.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|