 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In the Interest of M.D.D., No. 27811,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of parental rights was affirmed because the father did not contact or attempt to contact the custodians of the minor child during the six months prior to the petition being filed to maintain any relationship with the child.
|
|||||
| Owens v. Owens, No. 27618,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce proceeding, the wife was properly denied maintenance under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.335 because even if the wife were unable to meet her reasonable needs, the husband would not have the resources to pay a maintenance award; also, she was properly ordered to pay $ 73,266 as part of the division of the marital property.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Evans v. Brown Builders Elec. Co. , Nos. 27892, 27894, 27896, and 27897 Consolidated,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Apprentices were allowed to make less than the prevailing hourly wage rate because the program was properly registered with the U.S. Department of Labor, and the apprentices were paid at the rate specified in the registered program in compliance with Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 8, § 30-3.030(2).
|
|||||
| State v. Davis, No. 27905,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 195.202 was proper because defendant's actions, coupled with the fact that the key case at issue contained methamphetamine, constituted direct and circumstantial evidence sufficient to conclude that defendant possessed the methamphetamine.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
