 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bowles v. State, WD 65639,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2006 Order Filed;
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cox Health Sys. v. Div. of Workers' Comp. of the Dep't of Labor & Indus. Rels., WD 65530,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.140.4 (2000), the Division of Workers' Compensation could not reject a health care provider's medical fee dispute applications, without a hearing, on the grounds that the statute of limitations had run or that the underlying workers' compensation case has settled, dismissed, or otherwise administratively closed.
|
|||||
| Cox v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. ED86133,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, WD 64835,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| E.P. v. A.M. (In re Baby Girl P), WD65656,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Eichelberger v. Gateway Preventative Dental Group, LLC, No. ED86796,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ferrellgas, Inc. v. Edward A. Smith, P.C. , WD 65554,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment in favor of a law firm was affirmed because the one year statute of limitations in Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.6 applied pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 516.190 to bar the client's cause of action as the cause of action arose in California because that is where the damages became ascertainable in the underlying action.
|
|||||
| Flowers v. McDonald County, No. 26914,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal was dismissed because the record on appeal was not sufficient to address one of plaintiffs' arguments, but before doing so, the court determined that the phrase "redeemable at the pleasure of the county" on a bond did not affect the date the statute of limitations in Mo. Rev. Stat. § 516.110 (1994) began running on the obligation.
|
|||||
| Gupton v. Andrew Johnson's Constr., No. ED86018,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
