 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bryant v. State, No. ED86780,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 16, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Christensen v. Am. Food & Vending Servs., No. ED86906,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed a determination that the employer failed to prove that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with work under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.045 (Supp. 2004), because the employer did not state in its drug and alcohol policy that a positive test result would be deemed misconduct.
|
|||||
| City of Portage Des Sioux v. Lambert, No. ED84658,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed an appeal with respect to the grant of a mistrial because grant of a mistrial was not a final, appealable order pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 512.020 (2004), and it affirmed portion of a judgment granting an injunction against property owners because substantial evidence indicated their structures were unfit for use or habitation.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, No. ED85766,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Flemons v. State, WD 65184,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 16, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fulton v. State, No. ED86914,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fuse v. PW & D, Inc., No. ED87767,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 16, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court granted the Division of Employment Security's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant's notice of appeal was filed months after the deadline in Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.210.
|
|||||
| Glass v. First Nat'l Bank, No. SC87244,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment awarding damages pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 443.130 (2000) for a lender's failure to timely provide a sufficient deed of release on a mortgage that was satisfied, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 443.060.01 (2000), was affirmed because debtors' demand letter placed the lender on notice of its request, even though it did not specifically cite § 443.130.
|
|||||
| Guynes v. State, ED86515,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the denial of an inmate's motion pursuant to Mo. Sup. 24.035 as the inmate stated in his plea hearing that there were no additional witnesses he wanted to his counsel to contact, and the counsel's alleged fear of trial did not constitute a conflict of interest or ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
