 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Bradley, ED87423,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Clark, No. ED88562,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Gelbach, WD 66526,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2007, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Harris, No. ED88354,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Knight, No. ED88420,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Robertson, No. ED87965,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2007, OpinionFiled
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Turner v. State, WD 67015,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 9, 2007, Order Filed;
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Union Elec. Co. v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., No. ED88123,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment, which assessed 75 percent fault for a worker's injury to a sewer district on a power company's Mo. Rev. Stat. § 319.085 claim, was reversed and remanded for retrial because the circuit court erred when it permitted a civil engineer to testify about the meaning of the contract between the sewer district and the injured worker's employer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
