 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Crowder v. State, No. 27227,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reversed the denial of an inmate's motion pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 29.15 because a trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion where the inmate had timely filed his unsigned motion and then promptly signed the motion the next day.
|
|||||
| Laas v. Wright, No. 26799,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though a bail bond was terminated by a trial court after it was issued, judgment holding the accused's father liable to pay the promissory note he had given as partial payment for the bondsman's fee was affirmed; debt for which the promissory note was given was a valid debt and bondsman's initial liability was the consideration.
|
|||||
| Pargo v. State, No. 27377,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Escape rule warranted the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal because the two escapes, coupled with the fact that the escapes delayed his legal proceedings for months, showed the petitioner's intent to flout the authority of the courts from which he sought post-conviction relief and had an adverse impact on the administration of criminal justice.
|
|||||
| Reinbott v. Tidwell, No. 26992,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although claimants properly acquired a prescriptive easement for ingress and egress across an owner's property, the scope of the easement did not extend to certain culverts and aprons of the claimants' bridge across a river on the owner's property since the appurtenances were outside the width of the easement.
|
|||||
| Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Daniel Clampett Powell & Cunningham, LLC, No. SD26697,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, May 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Law firm was properly granted summary judgment on an insurer's petition for legal malpractice because the insurer presented no facts to support a finding that it received legal assistance from the firm, or that the firm intended to provide such assistance on the insurer's behalf; because no attorney-client relationship existed, no duty existed.
|
|||||
| State v. Gott, No. 27060,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for possessing methamphetamine was affirmed because the trial court properly admitted a crime lab report into evidence; the trial court could assume, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the officials charged with custody of the evidence properly discharged their duties and did not tamper with the evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
