|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Missouri - May 15, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Bd. of Educ. v. State, No. ED88467,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Based on the testimony, settlement agreement, and other evidence, a trial court did not err in holding, inter alia, that the State had not promised the continued use of the foundation formula as originally defined in Mo. Rev. Stat. § 163.031 (2006), and the term "full funding" was not synonymous with the ongoing use of a proration factor of 1.0.
|
|
| |
Boden v. Boden, No. ED87900 and ED88198,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 15, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because marital settlement was not unconscionable and no findings warranted relief under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 74.05 or 74.06, trial court was bound by original agreement's terms as to non-modifiable maintenance and had no authority under agreement, decree of legal separation, or Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.325, to modify parties' agreement as to maintenance.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
