 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Burns v. Smith, No. 26889,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, May 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding that plaintiff could maintain an action against a fellow employee notwithstanding that plaintiff's injuries were covered under Missouri's Workers' Compensation Law; fellow employee's act of repairing a pressure water tank that later exploded did not extend beyond plaintiff's employer's duty to provide a safe workplace.
|
|||||
| Chaganti v. Nowotny, No. ED87933,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 30, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss the appeal of a trial court's order for a change of venue was granted under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 74.01(b) because the trial court's order was not a final, appealable judgment.
|
|||||
| Chouteau Dev. Co., LLC v. Sinclair Mktg., WD 65660,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment in a redeveloper's equitable indemnity action to recover costs incurred in removing underground storage tanks was reversed, and the case was remanded as a former property owner, whose property was condemned, was liable for environmental costs that the owner had already become responsible for under Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 10, § 20-10.021.
|
|||||
| Cridlebaugh v. Putnam County State Bank, WD 65585,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment on a land owner's unjust enrichment claim in favor of the bank and the bank officer was improper as there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether a partial release of a deed of trust was conditioned on the owner paying her granddaughter's loan and whether the owner made a verbal promise to pay her granddaughter's loan.
|
|||||
| Dolan v. County Comm'n of Johnson County, WD 65949,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 30, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Eshnaur v. State, WD 65250,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 30, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Esposito v. State, No. ED86112,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Evans v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, WD 65471,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 30, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Frazier v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc., No. ED87359,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 30, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of a claimant's appeal challenging the denial of his claim for unemployment benefits was reversed and remanded because the claimant did not need to sign his initial appeal to the Appeals Tribunal, and since it was filed within 30 days of the disqualification determination, it was timely under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.070.4 (2000).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
