 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pruitt v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., WD66956,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 22, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's appeal from the dismissal of his petition, which alleged negligence, was not properly before appellate court as, under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 67.03, the dismissal was presumed to be without prejudice because trial court did not specify that the dismissal was with prejudice, and the inmate could cure defect by refiling a petition in trial court.
|
|||||
| Sredl v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., WD 67192,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prisoner's attempted appeal of a circuit court's letter, which stated that it lacked jurisdiction to consider his Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 74.01(a) motion for relief from judgment in favor of Missouri Department of Corrections, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because circuit court did not issue a document denominated a judgment addressing the motion.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Wolfrum v. Wiesman, No. SC88294,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, May 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of prohibition was made absolute because a continuance should have been granted despite defendant's objection; defendant's rights under Missouri's Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Law did not prohibit the granting of counsel's request for additional time when good cause was shown pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 217.460.
|
|||||
| State v. Byrd, WD 65998,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 22, 2007, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Byron, WD 66807,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 22, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because insufficient evidence linked defendant's intoxication to his actual operation of a vehicle while intoxicated, there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict convicting him of driving while intoxicated in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.010, and therefore the judgment of conviction was reversed.
|
|||||
| State v. Challans, No. ED87675,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 22, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Dawson, WD 66575,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 22, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Dixon, WD 67228,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, May 22, 2007, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Vaughn, No. ED88574,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 22, 2007, Decided , May 22, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal of his convictions was dismissed pursuant to the escape rule where his failure to appear for trial adversely affected the criminal justice system; his motion for a new trial and sentencing were delayed for four months as a result of his absconding. The trial court had to issue a capias warrant for him after his escape.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
