 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blevin v. Black, Cause No. BDR-2005-351,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Kalispell v. Burgert, Cause No. DC-02-253A,
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, FLATHEAD COUNTY, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Housel v. First Judicial Dist., Docket No. 05-729,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nauman v. State, Docket No. 05-731,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Seelye v. Perkins (In re N.P.), No.05-184,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the family lived in Colorado for several years prior to moving to Montana, the district court's order granting primary care to the mother in Colorado reflected the best interests of the child, Mont. Code Ann. § 40-4-212. Mont. Code Ann. § 40-4-226 did not require the state to pay the father's share of the cost of the custody evaluation.
|
|||||
| State v. Bell, CAUSE NO. DC-05-95,
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LAKE COUNTY, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Brown, Docket No. CDC-2004-259, Cause No. CDC-2004-257,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Little, CAUSE NO. DC-05-49,
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LAKE COUNTY, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Mizenko, No. 04-488,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in finding that a wife's statements to her neighbor, who testified in defendant's trial, were non-testimonial; the admission of the statements did not violate U.S. Const. amend. VI as claimed and fell under the excited utterance exception in Mont. R. Evid. 803(2).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
