 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Marriage of Heidema, No. 05-734,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The intervenor was not prejudiced by the entry of the dissolution decree before the parties responded to his discovery requests. The district court could not grant him any relief, because he was not a party to the marriage and had no standing to assert that the marriage was or was not irretrievably broken under Mont. Code Ann. § 40-4-101.
|
|||||
| Polzin v. Appleway Equip. Leasing, Docket No. DV-05-09,
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, JUDITH BASIN COUNTY, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ray v. Mont. Tech of the Univ. of Mont., No. 05-234,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly granted a college summary judgment and dismissed a professor's claims under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983; he did not show, for purposes of his claims of a violation of Mont. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-308(1)(c), 49-3-201(1), 49-2-303(1)(a), that he was discriminated against based on his political beliefs or marital status.
|
|||||
| Stanton v. Wells Fargo Bank Mont., N.A., No. DA 06-0139,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found that a beneficiary did not exercise undue influence over a settlor under Mont. Code Ann. § 28-2-407; although the parties shared a confidential relationship, the settlor had good mental condition, the disposition to the beneficiary was not unnatural, and the settlor was not easily influenced when she changed her trust.
|
|||||
| Thaut v. State, No. DA 06-0087,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly denied an inmate's petition for post-conviction relief; because certain claims should have been raised on direct appeal and were not, the inmate was procedurally barred from bringing those claims in his petition for post-conviction relief, for purposes of Mont. Code Ann. § 46-21-105(2).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
