 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Billings v. Gonzales, No. 05-259,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where none of the defendants possessed valid Montana licenses at the time that the State purportedly suspended or revoked their privileges, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed their convictions for driving while license suspended or revoked under Mont. Code Ann. § 61-5-212.
|
|||||
| Gudmundsen v. State, Docket No. ADV-2004-585,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Halloran v. Trex Co., CAUSE NO. DV-05-782A,
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, FLATHEAD COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hendricks v. State, No. 05-108,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where petitioner's appointed counsel prosecuted him for the sale of a dangerous drugs several years earlier while serving as a county attorney in the same jurisdiction, there was no actual conflict that adversely affected counsel's representation of petitioner on an aggravated assault charge. The court did not err by denying postconviction relief.
|
|||||
| Howard v. St. James Cmty. Hosp., No. 04-411,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The hospital did not violate the AIDS Prevention Act, Mont. Code Ann. § 50-16-1007, by performing an HIV test on an unconscious patient without seeking informed consent from his girlfriend. There was credible evidence to support a finding that she did not legally qualify as his "significant other" for purposes of Mont. Code Ann. § 50-16-1003(18).
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Fox, Cause No. ADR-2005-338,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Malcolm v. Evenflo Co., Cause No. DV-3-69,
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, PARK COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parrish v. State, Cause No. DV-05-778(A),
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, FLATHEAD COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Block, Cause No. DC-05-514,
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
