 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bitterroot Int'l Sys. v. Western Star Trucks, Inc., No. 05-426,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The facts were sufficient for the trial court to assert specific personal jurisdiction over a non-resident corporation pursuant to Mont. R. Civ. P. 4B(1)(a) and the exercise comported with constitutional limitations; the trial court did not err in submitting a lost volume seller instruction for purposes of Mont. Code Ann. § 30-2-708(2) to the jury.
|
|||||
| City of Helena v. Sonsteng, Cause No. CDC-2006-106,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Kalispell v. Brentwood, No. DA 06-0048,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Clark v. Roosevelt County, No. 05-580,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the property subject to a forfeiture order under Mont. Code Ann. § 44-12-102 was destroyed by a fire, the district court dismissed the petition for forfeiture. Whether the district court erred in determining that probable cause existed for the seizure of the property was moot.
|
|||||
| Dayrider v. State, Docket No. OP 06-0541,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted an inmate habeas corpus relief because the trial court sentenced the inmate to a term longer than that authorized under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-201, and thus the facially invalid sentence represented a miscarriage of justice for which habeas corpus relief was available.
|
|||||
| Glick v. Dep't of Child & Family Servs., Docket No. OP 06-0801,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Grimes v. McDonald, Docket No. OP 07-0107,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-202(2) did not preclude a trial court from imposing a parole restriction on only a portion of the term of a sentence, the court rejected an inmate's claim that the trial court erred in imposing a 25-year parole restriction on his 80-year sentence, and thus he was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.
|
|||||
| Linn v. Whitaker, No. DA 06-0058,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in dismissing with prejudice a pedestrian's lawsuit against respondents as a sanction under Mont. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(C) for discovery abuses; her responses to discovery were untimely and incomplete and the sanction properly related to the extent and nature of her actions and the prejudice suffered by respondents.
|
|||||
| State v. Hendershot, No. 04-429,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in denying defendant's substitution of counsel request for purposes of U.S. Const. amend. VI and Mont. Const. art. II, § 24; the record supported defendant's complaints regarding counsel and there was a complete collapse in the attorney-client relationship such that defendant's request should have been granted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
