 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Audet v. State, No. 05-373,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the trial court's denial of an inmate's petition for postconviction relief on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel; the trial court found no deficient performance on the part of counsel, and the appeal was without merit because the trial court properly interpreted the settled law on the subject.
|
|||||
| Centech Corp. v. Sprow, No. 05-280,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contrary to Mont. Code Ann. § 49-2-501, an employee did not timely plead wage disparity in her full-time employment, and the agency in question erred by sua sponte amending the pleadings to include this claim; the statute required a complaint be filed by the employee as a party claiming to be aggrieved, not the agency.
|
|||||
| Helena Abstract & Title Co. v. Mt. W. Bank, Cause No. BDV-2003-724,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Palmer v. Bahm, No. 05-224,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyer had no standing to enforce compliance with the provisions of a contract between the seller and purchaser because the buyer was not a party thereto; similarly, the buyer lacked standing to assert a statute of frauds argument under Mont. Code Ann. § 70-20-101 regarding that contract, and there was no breach of the buyer's agreement as claimed.
|
|||||
| Shelton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., Cause No. DV-99-87979,
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA COUNTY, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Clark, CAUSE NO. DC-01-168,
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LAKE COUNTY, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Huntsman, CAUSE NO. DC-02-136,
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LAKE COUNTY, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Paoni, No. 04-748,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for assault with a weapon under Mont. Code Ann. § 45-5-213 even assuming defendant preserved for appeal the issue of a violation of his rights under the Sixth Amendment; by not objecting, defendant waived any objection related to the State's comments during opening statements.
|
|||||
| Wm Scobie, Inc. v. Koch, Cause No. BDV-2004-894,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
