LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Montana - February 28 - March 5, 2007

  
Chandler v. Missoula County Prosecuting Atty., Docket No. OP 07-0041, SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The court denied an inmate's petition for habeas corpus because, for purposes of Mont. Code Ann. § 46-22-101(1), he failed to demonstrate that he was illegally restrained by the issuance of a bench warrant by the State, and there was no double jeopardy violation as the inmate claimed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Long v. State, Docket No. OP 07-0069, SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The court denied and dismissed an inmate's petition for habeas corpus relief; her plea of guilty waived nonjurisdictional defects, and the purpose of habeas corpus, to prevent illegal restraint under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-22-101(1) was not met, as the sentence was not alleged to be outside the statutory ranges or invalid under § 46-22-101(2).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Shepherd v. Shea, Docket No. CDV-2005-238, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Shepherd v. Shea, Docket No. CDV-2005-238, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State ex rel. United Banks, N.A. v. Twenty-Second Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. OP 07-0130, SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rocco v. Ogle, Cause No. CDC-2006-31, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, March 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rocco v. Ogle, Cause No. CDC-2006-31, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, March 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rocco v. Ogle, Cause No. CDC-2006-31, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, March 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Kaske, Docket No. DC-06-30, SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, RICHLAND COUNTY, March 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Swank Enters. v. All Purpose Servs., Ltd., No. DA 06-0143, SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Exclusions in an insurance policy did not apply to a city's claim against an additional insured, and thus the insurance company was liable to the additional insured and its insurer for the settlement the insurer paid, and the insured and insurer were entitled to prejudgment interest on that amount under Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-211.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.