 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lewis v. Lewis, No. DA 06-0340,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court correctly granted an ex-wife and a notary summary judgment in an action brought by the ex-husband related to a car the ex-wife traded; the ex-husband was released from paying for the car due to his bankruptcy and thus he lacked any ownership in the car.
|
|||||
| Miller v. Eleventh Judicial Dist. Court, No. OP07-0009,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where petitioner was incarcerated pending trial for negligent homicide and failure to remain at the scene of an accident, he was not entitled to habeas relief based on the district court's refusal to lower his $ 10,000 bail. Defendant failed to show that he was indigent or that his rights under Mont. Const. art. II, §§ 21, 22 were violated.
|
|||||
| Shepherd v. Shea, Docket No. CDV-2005-238,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shepherd v. Shea, Docket No. CDV-2005-238,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Bartosh, No. 05-368,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no abuse of discretion on the trial court's part in overruling defendant's objections to witness testimony and certain transcripts, as the trial court was entitled to review relevant evidence in making its sentencing decision, and the probation officer was entitled to the transcript information under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-112(2).
|
|||||
| State v. Malkuch, No. DA 06-0097,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A search by defendants' son and former babysitter was a private search for purposes of Mont. Code Ann. § 46-5-103, neither requested nor agreed to by the police, and thus the evidence obtained was not subject to the exclusionary rule and the trial court properly denied defendants' motion to suppress evidence.
|
|||||
| State v. Phillip Morris, Docket No. CDV-1997-306,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
