Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Montana - March 13, 2007
	State v. Seals, No. 05-711, SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 13, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: New consecutive sentences imposed after the revocation of suspended sentences was improper under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-203 because a district court's only option was to impose a lesser sentence since those originally imposed were illegal as outside of the parameters of Mont. Code Ann. § 45-9-102. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Whipps, L.L.C. v. Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, P.C., No. DA 06-0028, SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 13, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Where the landlord sued the tenant for breach of commercial lease, the tenant's offer of judgment pursuant to Mont. R. Civ. P. 68 did not waive the landlord's right to pursue contractual attorney fees. As neither party was the "prevailing" party, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the landlord's motion for attorney fees. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wing v. State, No. DA 06-0037, SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, March 13, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Summary judgment was granted for the State in a case arising from a car accident because Mont. Code Ann. § 2-9-301 was not unconstitutionally vague since a person of ordinary intelligence would have comprehended that the term "receipt" meant that the statute of limitations was tolled when a claim was actually received. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.