 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hall v. State, No. 05-124,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Firefighters' action against the State and the Public Employees' Retirement Board was properly dismissed; the firefighters' employers were responsible for correctly calculating and reporting their compensation under Mont. Code Ann. § 19-2-506 and Mont. Admin. R. 2.43.404(1), and any action related thereto should have been against the employers.
|
|||||
| Hembd v. Slaughter, Docket No. OP 06-0056,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re A.T., No. 05-344,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: By failing to appear at the termination hearing under Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-609 and failing to object either in person or by counsel to the manner in which the trial court conducted the termination hearing, the father waived his right to appeal the decision to terminate his parental rights without taking evidence at the hearing.
|
|||||
| In re B.N.Y., No. 05-301,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the order terminating a mother's parental rights was reversed, a subsequent action against her parental rights was not precluded. After several years of reunification efforts, the district court's failure to timely hold a permanency plan hearing under Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-445(1)(a)(i) did not violate the mother's right to due process.
|
|||||
| Meadow Lakes Estate Homeowner Assoc. v. Shoemaker, Cause No. DV-00-334,
TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, RAVALLI COUNTY, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mulkey v. Fifth Judicial Dist., Docket No. OP 06-0132,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Owens v. Mont. Dep't of Revenue, No. 05-306,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed an appeal from the trial court's decision affirming a Department of Revenue administrative decision because the trial court made its ruling without having the administrative record under Mont. Code Ann. § 2-4-614(1) before it, contrary to Mont. Code Ann. § 2-4-704(1) of the Montana Administrative Procedure Act.
|
|||||
| Saucier v. McDonald's Rests. of Mont., Inc., Cause No. DV 03-0279,
THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Morrisey, Cause No. ADC-02-356,
EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, CASCADE COUNTY, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
