 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Credit Serv. Co. v. Bender, No. 05-046,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly entered a judgment in favor of a collection agency in its action against a debtor because, contrary to the debtor's claim, there was no statute or authority that stated that the acts an individual performed for the debtor involving drafting a preliminary plat, for which the debtor did not pay, required a licensed engineer.
|
|||||
| In re A.J.E., No. 05-463,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly terminated the parental rights of a mother and a father under Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-609(1)(f)(ii), (4)(b) respectively, given that the mother was unfit to parent and the conditions rendering her unfit were unlikely to timely change, and the father was not able to assume the parental role.
|
|||||
| In re Declaring A.N.W., No. 04-882,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in terminating a father's parental rights under Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-609(4)(c); he was incarcerated until 2007, had little contact with the child, who had been living with relatives for 56 months, and termination was in the child's best interests, given her need for stability and permanency.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Diehl, Cause No. ADR-2000-399,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Haller, Cause No. BDR-2005-413,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Marriage of Haller, Cause No. BDR-2005-413,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Quantum Elec., Inc. v. Accutitle, Inc., No. DA-06-0014, No. DA-06-0062,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court refused to grant parties' request for an order staying the briefing schedule until completion of appellate mediation in two cases; Mont. R. App. P. 54(c) did not empower the court to extend the 75-day time period for completing appellate mediation, and the parties were free to file their stipulations to stay the schedule pursuant to the rule.
|
|||||
| Salminen v. Slaughter, Docket No. OP 06-0034,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Beltran, Cause No. BDC-2005-158,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, February 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
