 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Eagleman v. Mahoney, Docket No. OP 07-0242,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Imposition of prison time after a violation of probation did not constitute a more severe sentence than a commitment to a department of corrections; therefore, an amendment to Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-203 in 2003 did not constitute an ex post facto law as applied to an inmate seeking habeas corpus relief.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Tuck, Cause No. ADR-1999-159,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Billmayer v. City of Kalispell, No. DA 06-0392,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a city brought an action against a development company, Mont. Code Ann. § 2-6-102 permitted an architecture firm to review and make photocopies of an engineer's floodplain study. The engineer was not entitled to injunctive relief, because the information contained in the documents had been disclosed to the public, and was not confidential.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., Cause No. BDV-2005-431,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Lamach, Cause No. BDR-2006-14,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Parenting of Ketchum-Burch, Cause No. BDR-2006-437,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Marriage of Lamach, Cause No. BDR-2006-14,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Phillips, No. 05-702,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's postconviction sentencing claim was not procedurally barred under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-21-105(2), but the trial court properly denied his motion to withdraw his guilty plea; in dismissing the postconviction petition, the trial court did not violate the inmate's due process rights under U.S. Const. amend. XIV or Mont. Const. art. II, § 17.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
