 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bouma v. Ninth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. OP 07-0292,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the course of a court-supervised deposition, the district court did not abuse its discretion by advising the witness that he had a Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer questions as to the validity of his notary. Petitioner was not entitled to a writ of supervisory control, as the district court did not err by denying his motion to compel.
|
|||||
| Long v. State, Docket No. OP 07-0287,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied an inmate's petition for habeas corpus relief; she had been sentenced in 2005 and was not entitled to parole, which was within the state board of pardons and parole's discretion under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(1).
|
|||||
| Pate v. Novak, Cause No. BDV-2007-348,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, June 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lafournaise, Cause No. BDC-2005-379,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, June 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Bartsch, No. 05-297,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a marital dissolution, the district court considered the wife's contributions to the property pursuant to Mont. Code Ann. § 40-4-202 and awarded her 20 percent of the stock in a farm that was gifted to the husband. However, the district court's findings were insufficient to support the award of 80 percent of the remaining assets to the wife.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
