 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Helena v. Ritrovato, DA 06-0546,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: During defendant's trial for operating a motor vehicle without liability insurance and without a valid driver's license, the district court did not err by refusing to allow an individual accompanying defendant to join him at counsel table. Under Mont. Const. art. II, § 24, he had no right to representation by a person not licensed to practice law.
|
|||||
| In re D.F., No. DA 06-0275,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's child was taken in protective custody, and appellant failed to submit to drug testing, did not earn her GED, and failed to complete an anger management assessment. The trial court did not err by terminating her parental rights under Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-609(1)(f)(i), based on her failure to complete her treatment plan within a year.
|
|||||
| In re K.M., DA 06-0783, DA 06-0784, DA 06-0785,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A mother did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel during a termination of parental rights hearing because the lawyer had sufficient training and experience, and she was prepared for the case. The mother was unsuccessful due to her failure to cooperate and the fact that the evidence support the decision under Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-609(3).
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Erickson, DA 06-0512,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal from a divorce case was dismissed for failing to comply with M.R.App.P. 9(a) since there was no transcript provided; moreover, there was no statement of the issues, as required by M.R.App.P. 23(a)(2), or citation of legal authority to support a former husband's arguments, as required by Rule 23(a)(4).
|
|||||
| Miller v. Eighteenth Judicial Dist. Court, No. OP07-0134,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the prosecutor did not timely file notice of his intent to seek the death penalty in two felony cases, he failed to comply with the Supreme Court of Montana's Standards for Competency of Counsel for Indigent Persons in Death Penalty Cases I.1.a. The State was precluded from seeking the death penalty in these cases.
|
|||||
| State v. $ 129,970.00 in U.S. Currency, No. 05-585,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was arrested for DUI while driving a rental car, the rental agency had the authority to terminate the rental agreement and repossess the car. When the agency told the police to remove defendant's belongings, the removal of drug paraphernalia and marijuana found in plain view did not violate appellant's Fourth Amendment rights.
|
|||||
| State v. Poole, Cause No. BDC-2005-251,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, June 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
