 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Marriage of Harris, No. 04-619,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in its distribution of the marital estate under Mont. Code Ann. § 40-4-202, given that a trust should not have been included in the estate; however, maintenance awarded to the ex-wife under Mont. Code Ann. § 40-4-203 was proper given that the ex-wife could not maintain the standard of living that the ex-husband could.
|
|||||
| Modroo v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., Cause No. DV-03-620,
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA COUNTY, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Prindel v. Ravalli County, 04-640,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the plaintiff was stabbed at a party by an inmate released from the county jail due to an administrative error, the county had legal control of the inmate under Mont. Code Ann. § 7-32-2205 and owed a duty to protect citizens from harm. The district court erred by granting summary judgment for the county in the plaintiff's negligence case.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Smith, Docket No. CDR-2005-395,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Benton, No. 05-093,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: At the opening day of defendant's trial for felony criminal distribution of dangerous drugs, defendant attempted to add a name to the defense witness list for the trial. The district court did not abuse its discretion in precluding the witness from testifying, because defendant did not comply with Mont. Code Ann. §§ 46-15-322, -323.
|
|||||
| Stockman Bank of Mont. v. Potts, No. 04-639,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Individual wanted to introduce discussions of settlement in order to directly prove that there was no settlement, which was directly precluded by Mont. R. Evid. 408, a juror's affidavit could not impeach the verdict because it did not fall under the exceptions under Mont. R. Evid. 606(b), and a contested jury instruction did not misinform the jury.
|
|||||
| Levens v. Ballard, Docket No. CDV-2005-612,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, April 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lundberg, CAUSE NO. DC 05-0872,
THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, April 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stipe v. First Interstate Bank of Polson, Cause No. DV-02-197,
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LAKE COUNTY, April 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
