 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baumgardner v. Public Employees Ret. Bd., Cause No. ADV-2002-450,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gilman v. Rule, Docket No. CDV-2005-808,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Custody & Parental Rights of D.B., No. 05-515,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a termination of parental rights proceeding, the district court found that the mother abused prescription medication and was not able to meet the needs of her children. The district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that the condition rendering the mother unfit to parent was unlikely to change within a reasonable time.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Susag, Docket No. CDV-94-1591,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Neil Consultants, Inc. v. Lindeman, No. 05-348,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action for breach of contract, the district court did not err by granting plaintiff's motion for a judgment on the pleadings. Defendant failed to state a legal defense in his answer, as required by Mont. R. Civ. P. 8(d).
|
|||||
| Raymond v. Hull, No. 05-462,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action for partition of property held by co-tenants, the district court did not err by denying defendant's untimely motion for new trial under Mont. R. Civ. P. 59(b). Defendant's Mont. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion did not set forth excusable neglect or any other reason justifying relief from the partition order.
|
|||||
| State v. Collins, No. 04-687,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Pierce, No. 05-141,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Price, No. 04-809,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, April 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's trial for assault with a weapon, the trial court judge, in objecting sua sponte to evidence of defendant's roommate's propensity for violence when he drank, was attempting to ensure a fair trial and did not abandon the duty of impartiality by volunteering one objection and corresponding instruction to the jury.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
