 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Boettcher v. Mont. Guaranty Fund, No. DA 06-0011,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the court held that the Montana Insurance Guaranty Association was not a state agency for purposes of Mont. R. App. P. 38, individuals had to comply with the rule in filing their notice of constitutional challenge, and because they did not, the notice was untimely and stricken upon request.
|
|||||
| In re A.L., No. DA 06-0030,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the trial court's finding that the state department of public health proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the father's son was abused or neglected, for purposes of Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-437(2); the evidence showed that the child was being forcibly pulled between the father and mother.
|
|||||
| In re Inquiry of J.B., No. 05-675,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a father battled substance abuse, anger management, and marital issues, his two young children were adjudicated youths in need of care. After he failed to complete treatment programs, the district court did not abuse its discretion in terminating his parental rights under Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-609(1)(f).
|
|||||
| State v. Borsberry, No.05-401,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction of felony insurance fraud/theft in violation of Mont. Code Ann. §§ 33-1-1202(1), 45-6-301(6)(a), and restitution was proper under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-201(5); defendant failed to fully disclose accident details to his insurer, which caused the insurer a pecuniary loss.
|
|||||
| Voerding v. State, No. 05-534,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon the revocation of an inmate's suspended sentence, he was entitled to have his prison earnings applied to the payment of court ordered fines. The court distinguished "fines" under Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-403(2) from other court-imposed financial obligations and affirmed the denial of the inmate's request for credit against court costs and fees.
|
|||||
| Watkins v. Blackies Fresno Tavern, Docket No. DV-04-005,
TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, HILL COUNTY, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
