 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Estate of James, Cause No. DP-99-4782,
FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, BEAVERHEAD COUNTY, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Germann v. Stephens, No. 05-446,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly granted a city and city council members summary judgment in connection with business owner's claims under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 and under Mont. Const. art. II, §§ 4, 17, 29 because she did not show that city's actions in denying her use permits deprived her of a vested property right to operate a business as a bar or casino.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Olson, Cause No. DR-03-686,
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA COUNTY, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mont. Petroleum Tank Release Comp. Bd. v. Capitol Indem. Co., No. 05-228,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-202(1), a claim for reimbursement by the Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board to an indemnity company was time-barred, and the board had no other subrogation rights; the award of sanctions under Mont. R. Civ. P. 37(d)(2) against an insurer was proper.
|
|||||
| North 93 Neighbors, Inc. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs , No. 05-179,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the county board of commissioners amended zoning regulations for the development of a shopping mall, the board's sole reliance on a report prepared before over 4,400 members of the public voiced their concerns rendered the board's decision an abuse of discretion under the Montana Growth Policy Act, Mont. Code Ann. §§ 76-1-602 to -604.
|
|||||
| Stringer-Altmaier v. Haffner, No. 04-352,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: For purposes of Mont. Code Ann. § 49-2-303(1)(a), there was a hostile work environment that the employee was subjected to when a manager harassed her and the owner failed to do anything about the matter, and thus the trial court's ruling affirming the reversal of a finding of discrimination was improper.
|
|||||
| Sullivan v. Helena Sch. Dist. No. 1, Cause No. ADV-2006-71,
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vogel v. Intercontinental Truck Body, Inc., No. 05-390,
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA, June 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a workers' compensation case, the employee claimed that he was unable to perform his job. Judicial estoppel precluding him from taking an inconsistent position in his suit for damages under the Montana Wrongful Discharge From Employment Act, Mont. Code Ann. §§ 39-2-901 to -915. The employer was entitled to summary judgment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
