 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Perry Lumber Co. v. Durable Servs., No. S-05-005.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which a lumber company claimed that a duct heater installer was responsible for a fire that damaged the lumber company's facilities, the trial court erred in determining that a chief of a voluntary fire department did not qualify as a fire investigation expert pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-702.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Comm'n on Judicial Qualifications v. Lindner (In re Lindner), No. S-35-050002.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judge received a public reprimand for violating Neb. Code Jud. Conduct Canon 1(A) and 3(B)(4) and (5), and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-722(6), because the judge made a derogatory remark in an apparent reference to a criminal defendant or persons with him.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. Coe, No. S-05-744.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State supreme court ordered that an attorney be disbarred pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. Disc. 4 as the attorney failed to respond to the formal charges against him, and he had failed to take the proper actions in several cases and violated several disciplinary rules that resulted in prejudice to his clients in their respective cases.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. Muia, Nos. S-04-1375, S-05-1115.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As attorney had not sought reinstatement after a prior suspension; he was retroactively suspended, for, inter alia, not promptly notifying his clients of his previous suspension or promptly paying them their funds that he retained in his trust account in violation of, inter alia, former Neb. Code Prof. Resp. DR 1-102(A)(1) and 9-102(B)(3) and (4).
|
|||||
| State v. Dunlap, No. S-05-578.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an order to disqualify the county attorney's office due to an alleged conflict of interest was not a final, appealable order and the State did not appeal from a final order as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2315.01, the State's appeal of the disqualification order was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
