Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Nebraska - March 9, 2007
	Betterman v. State DMV, Nos. S-05-638, S-06-823., SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 9, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Driver's license was revoked as report submitted at license revocation hearing conveyed information required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-498.01. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-913.04(2), driver's argument with regard to impartiality or employment status of hearing officer was refused. Driver refused to submit to chemical test, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,197. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Michael U. (In re Michael U.), No. S-05-1525., SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 9, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1902, Nebraska Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction to address appellant's issues on appeal relating to order of adjudication and neither did Nebraska Supreme Court because appellant did not appeal district court's finding that the order of adjudication was not a final order and the dismissal of that order. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Worth v. Kolbeck, No. S-05-269, SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, March 9, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Trial court did not err in instructing jury on doctor's theory that mother was sole proximate cause of her child's in utero injuries. Instructions were sufficient to allow child's recovery unless jury concluded that doctor's negligence, if any, was not a substantial factor or substantial contributing cause in bringing about the injuries. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.