 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| INA Group, LLC v. Young, Nos. S-05-231, S-05-268, S-05-338, S-05-348, S-05-414, S-05-415, S-05-421, S-05-650.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, July 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A city's special assessments were not "subsequent taxes," where they were not "subsequent" within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1913. "Subsequent taxes" within the meaning of the statute did not include taxes, whether general taxes or special assessments, that were assessed and levied prior to the commencement of a foreclosure proceeding.
|
|||||
| Japp v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Res. Dist., No. S-05-398.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, July 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the dam site agreed upon for development between natural resources district and corporation was not approved as an improvement project area, the landowners were not required to challenge the board of directors' decision under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-3255; therefore, the district court erred in dismissing their action for lack of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Le v. Lautrup, No. S-04-743.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, July 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which the parents of a minor child sued the child's grandfather, who was the driver of a vehicle involved in an accident that injured the child, the parents failed to establish that Nebraska's guest statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,237, was unconstitutional.
|
|||||
| Neb. Legislature ex rel. State v. Hergert, No. S-06-425.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, July 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant regent was guilty of violations of false reporting under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-907 where the evidence showed that in the primary and general elections, defendant intentionally delayed filing his 40% affidavits in an effort to ensure that his opponents did not timely receive public funding.
|
|||||
| Pachunka v. Rogers Constr., Inc., No. S-04-1470.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, July 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred by submitting the construction company's defense of assumption of risk to the jury where the evidence did not establish that the risk was voluntarily assumed by the sales agent. The trial court erred by instructing the jury on the issue.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
