 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Garnett v. Genetic Improvement Servs. of N.C., Inc. (In re Estate of Dueck), No. S-06-538.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, August 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment denying the claimant's petition for allowance of claim against the deceased's estate was affirmed because the record supported the finding that there was no written or oral guaranty agreement between the deceased and the claimant.
|
|||||
| Koch v. Aupperle, No. S-06-264.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, August 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An injunction was improperly granted in a case involving a dispute over water rights because a downstream user did not have senior riparian rights due to his construction of a dam in 1989; moreover, he was not entitled to injunctive relief since he had no common-law riparian rights.
|
|||||
| Koch v. Aupperle (In re Koch), No. S-06-736.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, August 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The issue presented in an appeal by landowners was moot because any determination of water rights of the landowners and their neighbor would be nothing more than an advisory opinion, as there was no case and controversy regarding such rights. The public interest exception to the mootness doctrine did not apply.
|
|||||
| Omaha Police Union Local 101 v. City of Omaha, No. S-06-403.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, August 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a protected speech matter involving a police union and a city, Nebraska Commission of Industrial Relations (CIR) used wrong standard because CIR used legal standard that applied private sector labor relations cases. A different standard for public employer and employees should have been used.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
