 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Irving F. Jensen Co. v. State, No. S-04-1315.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, August 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-8,306, the State of Nebraska, Department of Roads' (DOR) breach of contract occurred on May 22, 2001, when the DOR denied the corporation's claim for extra compensation for extra work resulting from differing conditions. The corporation's other claims against the DOR were time barred.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Am. Ins. Co. v. Constructors Bonding Co., No. S-05-251.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, August 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in a bonding company's favor in an insurer's negligence suit was proper as the insurer failed to establish that the bonding company had a duty to disclose to the insurer any claims activity involving a third party and another surety to whom the insurer issued surety bonds.
|
|||||
| State v. Iromuanya, No. S-05-367.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, August 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting witness's testimony: (1) about defendant's hairstyle on the day of the shooting; (2) about who defendant's friends were; or (3) about the witness's fear of defendant's friends because none of the testimony implicated gang involvement, and the testimony was relevant to the witness's credibility.
|
|||||
| Dennes v. Dunning, No. A-05-182.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, August 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983, on the pleadings presented, plaintiff failed to state a claim against a county and the other defendants in their official capacities, where plaintiff failed to allege any official policy or custom of the county which inflicted the alleged injuries or deprivations of federal rights.
|
|||||
| Lenzen v. JG Shopping Ctr. Mgmt. LLC, No. A-04-1214.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, August 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury action brought by plaintiff married couple after wife slipped and fell at a mall, plaintiffs failed to adduce any evidence which would permit a fact finder to infer that defendants and their agents were negligent in not having discovered a clear liquid and napkins on the floor in time to remedy situation prior to wife's fall.
|
|||||
| Olson v. Capital Elec., No. A-05-1555.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, August 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-121(1), the evidence supported an award of total temporary disability benefits to the employee where accepting the position in Kansas City was not a feasible option for the employee and that despite the possibility of employment there, the trial court was not clearly wrong in awarding benefits.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
