 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Neiman v. Neiman, No. A-05-654.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, September 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Molina-Navarrete, No. A-06-1362.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, September 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Palu, No. A-06-1166.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, September 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fickle v. State, No. S-04-1250.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, September 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Jones, No. S-06-798.,
SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA, September 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Eagle Run Square II, LLC v. Lamar's Donuts Int'l, Inc., No. A-05-1038.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, October 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which an LLC brought an action to recover on a personal guaranty signed by a guarantor, because the guaranty was unambiguous as a matter of law, the trial court erred in overruling the guarantor's motion for directed verdict on the basis it was ambiguous.
|
|||||
| Papio-Missouri River Natural Res. Dist. v. Willie Arp Farms, Inc., No. A-05-1387.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, October 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury award rendered in favor of the company was vacated because the district court improperly allowed the company to be substituted for the shareholder as condemnee, when the Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District had the right to decide whose interest it would condemn.
|
|||||
| State v. Hobbs, No. A-06-658.,
NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, October 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion to suppress evidence was properly denied in a drug case because defendant was not in custody after a car he was a passenger in was stopped for speeding; his detention was more analogous to a Terry stop than an arrest, and the "what is that" questions asked did not exceed the bounds of permissible investigatory questioning.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
