 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bedore v. Familian, No. 42075,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the corporation's directors breached their fiduciary duties by taking excess salaries and usurping a corporate opportunity, their misconduct did not amount to fraud justifying a buy-out, but under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 78.7502(2), the directors were not entitled to indemnification for conduct constituting bad faith and intentional misconduct.
|
|||||
| George v. State, No. 41638,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to a new trial when defendant filed a notice of appeal after he was convicted of sexual assault and lewdness with a minor, but before a final judgment was entered, because the notice of appeal was never transmitted to the supreme court and defendant was deprived of his right to appeal.
|
|||||
| Moore v. State, No. 43248,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In trial for fraudulent use of credit card, conviction was improper because jury was improperly instructed on element of offense. Under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 205.760(1)(a), presentment alone did not constitute use when card was never processed, and defendant never obtained goods.
|
|||||
| Waddell v. L.V.R.V. Inc., No. 43149,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence existed to support revocation of acceptance of RV under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2608(1); chronic engine overheating problems substantially impaired RV's value to purchasers who had wanted to spend 2 or 3 years driving it around the country, and it was in service department for 213 days during 18 months immediately after purchase.
|
|||||
| Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. State, No. 41324, No. 41325, No. 41326, No. 41327, No. 41328, No. 41329, No. 41330, No. 41331,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because no rule or statute authorized appeals from district court orders denying a motion to remit surety bond or any other order entered in an ancillary bail bond proceeding, the orders were not appealable. Therefore, the Nevada Supreme Court dismissed the appeals.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
