 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Herman v. State, No. 43214,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a first-degree murder case where defendant's DNA sample was obtained during his previous robbery trial, Nev. Const. art. I, § 18 was not violated by allowing his DNA information linking him to the murder into evidence as he provided the sample for use in a public forum without limitation on the use or storage of the sample.
|
|||||
| Simonian v. Univ. & Cmty. College Sys. , No. 39292,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for University and Community College System of Nevada (UCCSN) in plaintiff's false claims action was proper because the State was not a "person" for purposes of False Claims Act liability and USSCN was a state entity.
|
|||||
| State v. Sargent, No. 44558,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Justice court did not have jurisdiction to order defendant to personally appear at a preliminary hearing on indecent exposure charge where defendant had filed a waiver of personal appearance and his counsel appeared on his behalf. Nothing in Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 178.388 or 171.196 required defendant's presence at the preliminary hearing.
|
|||||
| Carson-Tahoe Hosp. v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, No. 43638,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, March 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Project financed with economic development bonds under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 244A.763(5) was subject to prevailing wage requirements if it was "public work" involving "public body" under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 338.010; private hospital project was not public work and did not involve public body and court erred in holding prevailing wages were required.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
