 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State ex rel. State Bd. of Equalization v. Bakst, No. 46752,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, December 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Methodologies used by the county appraiser were invalid because their inconsistent application violated the uniform and equal rate of assessment required by Nev. Const. art. 10. Therefore, the taxpayer's property 2003-2004 valuations, which were based on those methodologies, were unjust and inequitable and taxpayers were entitled to a refund.
|
|||||
| Summers v. State, No. 45683,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, December 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no violation of the Sixth Amendment when testimonial hearsay regarding defendant's juvenile and adult criminal history was admitted into evidence in a capital penalty hearing since the decision in Crawford did not apply to such hearings, and the evidence was allowed under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.552(3).
|
|||||
| Thomas v. State, No. 46509,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, December 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant's childhood and upbringing were not the best, he expressed remorse, and he had made some effort to counsel others against taking his path, he robbed his former employer at gunpoint and sought out the potential witnesses (victims) and stabbed them to death. Thus, his death sentences for the first-degree murders were not excessive.
|
|||||
| Washoe Med. Ctr. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court , No. 45763,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA, December 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As patient failed to meet Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41A.071's expert affidavit requirement in her medical malpractice action, complaint was void ab initio and had to be dismissed, without prejudice, and no amendment under Nev. R. Civ. P. 15(a) to cure a Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41A.071 defect was allowed; thus court erred by denying hospital's motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
