 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Father 2006-360, No. 2006-360,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, March 16, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in denying the father's requests for appointment of counsel in abuse and neglect proceedings under RSA ch. 169-C because due process did not require that counsel be appointed for an unaccused, non-custodial parent in RSA ch. 169-C proceedings.
|
|||||
| State v. Parker, No. 2005-859,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, March 16, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the particular language of a 1990 sentencing order provided that sentencing would not be completed until 2005 when the trial court considered whether to impose a deferred seven-year term, it was a critical state of the proceeding to which defendant was entitled to counsel under N.H. Const. pt. I, art 15.
|
|||||
| Syncom Indus. v. Wood, No. 2005-126,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, March 16, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action involving the enforceability of restrictive covenants, first employee could not claim an excuse for failure to comply on the basis of an alleged anticipatory repudiation of the employment contract due to the employer's intent to impose a one-week suspension because any violation of RSA 275:43-b was not per se an anticipatory repudiation.
|
|||||
| In re Guardianship of R.A., No. 2006-104,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, March 20, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A probate court properly held that a guardian had authority to admit a ward to a hospital under RSA 464-A:25(I)(a) (2005) as nothing in RSA 464-A:25(I)(c) (2005) conditioned the guardian's authority upon court review every five years. The issue of whether the guardian could have consented to medical treatment was moot.
|
|||||
| Malachy Glen Assocs. v. Town of Chichester, Nos. 2004-886, 2006-111,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, March 20, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's order requiring a zoning board of adjustment to grant a property owner's application for a variance from the wetlands ordinance was affirmed as granting the variance would not have altered the neighborhood's essential character, the proposed storage unit project protected the wetlands, and the project was an otherwise permitted use.
|
|||||
| Premier Capital, LLC v. Skaltsis, No. 2005-441,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, March 30, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An assignee's suit against mortgagors was not time-barred because the 20-year statute under RSA 508:6 (1997) applied. Evidence that the mortgagors' file was physically transferred to the assignee's employee with an understanding that the employee would enforce the mortgagors' obligation on the assignee's behalf was enough evidence of an assignment.
|
|||||
| State v. White, No. 2006-199,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, March 30, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officer's testimony regarding another person accused of the crime but acquitted was inadmissible because the other person did not testify, there was no record defendant had an opportunity to cross-examine the other person, and there was no indication that the other person was unavailable; in addition, the confession was offered for its truth.
|
|||||
| In re Bosse's Case, No. LD-2006-009,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, April 4, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney who violated N.H. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c) when he signed a property owner's name to an exclusive listing agreement and purchase and sale agreement without the owner's knowledge or consent was suspended from the practice of law for two years, rather than disbarred, as he had engaged in a single episode of deceitful conduct.
|
|||||
| State v. Shannon, No. 2006-056,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, April 4, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly imposed on defendant the burden of proving that a restitution order was precluded by a restitution order from another state where he conceded that he was responsible for the losses and thus, he was attempting to rebut the presumption evidenced in RSA 651.61-a, I. The finding that he had to pay restitution was appropriate.
|
|||||
| State v. Steimel, No. 2006-115,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, April 4, 2007, Opinion Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in suppressing defendant's statements to a police officer where the officer had asked permission to speak to defendant in the hospital and any restraint had been imposed by hospital staff rather than the officer. Suppressing defendant's blood test results was also error as exigent circumstances justified the warrantless search.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
