 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Reid, DOCKET NO. A-3424-05T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In prosecution for computer-related theft, as subpoena was not issued in compliance with New Jersey law, and defendant had an expectation of privacy under N.J. Const. art. I, para. 7 with respect to information on file with internet service provider that identified her as the user of coded screen name, trial court properly suppressed such evidence.
|
|||||
| Finderne Heights Condominium Ass'n v. Rabinowitz, DOCKET NO. A-6135-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) requirements in the Condominium Act and the Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act, a unit owner or a condominium association was not prohibited from initiating litigation without first submitting the dispute to ADR, if there were compelling circumstances.
|
|||||
| In re Spiegel, D-62 September Term 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Monogram Credit Card Bank of Georgia v. Tennesen, DOCKET NO. A-6267-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As record supported court's findings that seller failed to deliver conforming merchandise to consumer and then failed to afford him options required under N.J.A.C. 13:45A-5.1(c), seller's violation of N.J.A.C. 13:45A-5.1(c), regardless of intent or moral culpability, was per se violation of New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. §§ 56:8-1 to -20.
|
|||||
| New Jersey Div. of Youth & Family Services v. F.H., DOCKET NO. A-3477-04T4, A-3846-04T4,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A judgment terminating the parental rights of a father and mother was affirmed as to their middle child since it was shown that they were unable or unwilling to provide a safe and secure environment for that child based on his special needs and history of injuries, but the judgment was reversed as to the parents' two other children.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
