 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fitzgerald v. Tom Coddington Stables, A-119 September Term 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a horse-trainer employee was not a "horse racing industry employee" as defined by former N.J. Stat. Ann. § 34:15-131 of the New Jersey Horse Racing Injury Compensation Board Act, her employer, not the New Jersey Horse Racing Compensation Injury Compensation Board, was obliged to pay her worker compensation benefits.
|
|||||
| In re Simms, D-75 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Winner v. Revill, DOCKET NO. A-6750-03T5,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted injured parties' motion to compel arbitration of a dispute concerning UIM benefits, as the injured parties did not forfeit those benefits by accepting a settlement of claims against the tortfeasor, and the UIM clause in the disputed policy remained in full force and effect.
|
|||||
| County of Essex v. First Union Nat. Bank, A-107/A-108 September Term 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As bank officer bribed county official to obtain underwriting privileges on bond issues, bank was obliged to disgorge all fees it received in connection with the bond transactions, but not fees it paid to innocent underwriters. As trial court erred by imposing burden of proof on county to prove bank shared underwriting fees, remand was required.
|
|||||
| Hornet Exp. v. Zurich American Ins. Group, DOCKET NO. A-7135-03T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying an insurer's summary judgment motion in a trucking company's action seeking a declaration that the insurer was obligated to provide benefits for injuries suffered by a worker in Pennsylvania, as the policy unambiguously stated that it only applied to workers' compensation benefits awarded in New Jersey.
|
|||||
| In re Commitment of M.M., A-7 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Santiago, D-89 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parker v. City of Trenton, DOCKET NO. A-0440-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order denying reconsideration of partial summary judgment was plainly unappealable as interlocutory under N.J. Ct. R. 2:5-6, as counts alleging retaliation and spoliation of evidence survived. Judicial economy would be better served by considering all issues on appeal of summary judgment order.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
