 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Landfield, D-37 September Term 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Landfield, D-37 September Term 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 27, 2006 , January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Landfield, D-37 September Term 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When it was clear that many ethical issues required determination, New Jersey attorney was suspended for six months but warned that he could not seek reinstatement until at least six months after filing proof of compliance pursuant to N.J. Ct. R. Prof. Conduct 1:20-20(b)(15)..
|
|||||
| In re Scoon, D-78 September Term 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, January 27, 2006, Decided , January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pardo v. Dominguez, DOCKET NO. A-3388-04T3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in dismissing the injured passenger's complaint for failure to satisfy the verbal threshold of N.J. Stat. Ann. § 39:6A-8(a) because the existence of a herniated disc was sufficient to satisfy the verbal threshold. Also, the judge gave no reasons for his conclusions, but findings were required by N.J. Ct. R. 1:7-4(a).
|
|||||
| State v. Drury, DOCKET NO. A-2489-03T4,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's first-degree sexual assault conviction under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:14-2(a)(3) was reduced to second-degree sexual assault because the evidence did not support a finding that he was attempting, or in the commission of, or in flight from the commission of a carjacking during the time he was inside a house with the sexual assault victim.
|
|||||
| State v. Hawkins, DOCKET NO. A-0165-04T1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's forfeiture of bonds issued by a surety was reversed because the surety was not advised of defendant's failure to appear and had not been sent notice of the forfeiture as required under former N.J. Ct. R. 3:26-6(a).
|
|||||
| State v. Miller, DOCKET NO. A-5441-03T2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where jury acquitted defendant of charged offenses but deadlocked on lesser-included offense for which jury trial was not available, court erred by deciding case de novo on evidence presented. Trial court should have granted a new trial, thus returning the parties to original position and allowing defendant to present evidence in different manner.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
